Gears of War 2 will definitely not be heading to PC according to Epic, who are concerned with piracy issues.

Gears of War 2 will definitely not be heading to PC according to Epic, who are concerned with piracy issues.

Gear of War 2 has been creating a bit of a stir in the bit-tech.net forums lately for a number of reasons, not least of which is the fact that the game is being definitely billed as an Xbox 360 exclusive. It won't be coming to PC.

In a discussion with TVG recently, Gears of War 2 designer Cliff Bleszinski said that the reason there was not going to be a PC version of the game was simple; high-end users.

"The PC right now is a fair amount different to what it was back in the day, with all the badly integrated video chips," said Cliff.

"Here's the problem right now; the person who is savvy enough to want to have a good PC to upgrade their video card, is a person who is savvy enough to know bit torrent to know all the elements so they can pirate software. Therefore, high-end videogames are suffering very much on the PC."

Cliff then went on to confirm that unlike Gears of War 1, which did see an eventual port to the PC, the second game will not be making the same move. Asked if Gears of War 2 PC would be possible once the dust had settled and sales had declined on the Xbox 360 version, Cliff still said no; definitely not.

Unfortunately then it looks like PC gamers who want to get a slice of Gears of War 2 will either have to get it from consoles, or have to wait for the film adaptation to be finished and given a sequel.

If you want to know more about Gears of War 2 and what we think of it then you can check out our hands-on Gears of War 2 preview, or let us know what you think of the forums.
Quote Burnout21 30th September 2008, 10:22
what about rich gits like me, i can afford to buy the game and the hardware!

Cant they look at it another way, that the poor gamer with the low end to midrange hardware cant afford £40 a game so they turn to torrents!
Quote N19h7m4r3 30th September 2008, 10:23
What a load of crock! I know ALOT of people that can't even run WoW properly, let alone a High-End game and they're always telling me how they torrent.

As much as I have supported Epic for their amazing games. I am done buying from them.
Quote feedayeen 30th September 2008, 10:25
So what happened to console emulators? Why haven’t the current gen systems been ported yet to the PC?
Quote ChaosDefinesOrder 30th September 2008, 10:34
FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS DON'T WORK ON CONSOLES!
/rant

*sigh*

Seriously, console gamepads are not suited to FPS games, even watching someone who has played waaaay too much Halo/Gears etc you can still see that the view motion is jerky.

Mouse is far superior for freelook controlling, which suits it to PC better.
Quote steveo_mcg 30th September 2008, 10:37
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS DON'T WORK ON CONSOLES!
/rant

*sigh*

Seriously, console gamepads are not suited to FPS games, even watching someone who has played waaaay too much Halo/Gears etc you can still see that the view motion is jerky.

Mouse is far superior for freelook controlling, which suits it to PC better.

As i learned yesterday gow is infact 3rd person and tbh 3rd person does work ok on consoles but i've never liked it on pc i can't get my head round it even gt3 was a bit of a problem for me.
Quote Jack_Pepsi 30th September 2008, 10:38
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Cliff Biro guy
"Here's the problem right now; the person who is savvy enough to want to have a good PC to upgrade their video card, is a person who is savvy enough to know bit torrent to know all the elements so they can pirate software. Therefore, high-end videogames are suffering very much on the PC."

Seriously?

We really need to get that sand out of your vagina dude, it's making you cranky!
Quote Hamish 30th September 2008, 10:39
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS DON'T WORK ON CONSOLES!
/rant

*sigh*

Seriously, console gamepads are not suited to FPS games, even watching someone who has played waaaay too much Halo/Gears etc you can still see that the view motion is jerky.

Mouse is far superior for freelook controlling, which suits it to PC better.

absolutely, but GoW was a pretty terrible game on PC anyway
havent played it on xbox but cant imagine it being much better, not really bothered by this news :p

edit:
that quote from cliff is mildy offensive tbh
my PC is a high-end gaming pc and i buy FAR more games than any of my friends with **** PCs and consoles
granted i also pirate more games than them, but i only pirate the crappy games :p
Quote adamc 30th September 2008, 10:42
There's a difference between knowing about torrents and wishing to use them for everything.
Quote Daniel114 30th September 2008, 10:45
I'm glad to be honest. I liked the first game and would have probably bought this if it game to PC.... Only yet again to be frustrated at the way it constantly lost games, was a pain in the ass to reinstall, and couldn't be played without using a no-cd crack.

Cheers epic, sanity maintained. Glad those naughty PC pirates wont be able to get their grubby hands on your bug-ridden POS game
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
Seriously, console gamepads are not suited to FPS games, even watching someone who has played waaaay too much Halo/Gears etc you can still see that the view motion is jerky.

Nah there not, but GOW is. I play it using an XBOX remote rather than mouse and it feels far more natural
Quote RotoSequence 30th September 2008, 10:49
Wow, **** you and your product too, Epic.
Quote [USRF]Obiwan 30th September 2008, 10:52
yeah blame everything on pc piracy. Bad games sales, bad reviews, bad previews, bad game trailers, bad consoles, bad economy, bad incomes, bad weather, bad environment, bad health.

Its all the fault of PC piracy.

I don't know where he is getting his 'facts' but i see a shitload of torrent sites loaded with x360 and other console titles.
Quote reflux 30th September 2008, 10:56
Oh for f*cks sake.

Yet again we see piracy blamed to justify lazy and selfish game developers.

Epic - are you aware that the PC was what put you where you are now?

Epic can go to HELL.

And someone needs to kick them out of the PC gaming alliance.
Quote DougEdey 30th September 2008, 11:01
They're justified to not sell it on PC down to pure economics, in December 2007 Gears had sold 4 million copies in total.

PC release: November 2007
360 release: November 2006

So in one year they sold 4 million copies pretty much on the 360 alone.

They've currently sold over 5 million copies in total, so since the PC release only 1 million more have been sold, I don't have the exact figures for the split but I'm willing to bet 9/10 were sold on 360 and the extra development time and cost was not worth it especially since the PC release was extremely buggy!
Quote steveo_mcg 30th September 2008, 11:05
Quite true, its just a shame they feel the need to justify them selves with fud. If they expected to sell 3m on the pc and didn't they need to ask why. Epic have obviously done so and arrived at piracy as the official party line instead of admiting it was a mediocre game for the pc that many people had already played on its native platform where, by all account, its a better experience.
Quote PQuiff 30th September 2008, 11:06
WTF!!!!

Chicken or the Egg? Maybe if we the PC game buying public STOP GETTING SHAFTED, we would be more likley to purchase games.

First its EA and it beta battlefield that takes 4 patches to fix broken net code and bugs. second its EA and there Terrible Download manager. Then its Bioshock and its shi*y secure rom. Spore and its WTFing DRM. Then EA are back at it with Crysis warhead. Stalker and its lovely Broken game( its a good game but having to restart it each time they try patch it. 4 times so far)

We get treated like morons. Of course there is a piracy problem. Thats never going to change. But there are some of us that actually buy games and resent getting bum robbed every time we go to the shops.

Well here to Cliffy. lets hope hes a man of his word and a half arsed PC conversion doesn't crawl out the door a few years down the line when no one cares.
Quote neonplanet40 30th September 2008, 11:06
Who cares the game sucks anyway lol

Lets be honest. They have obviously been paid quite a bit of money by microsoft to make it an xbox 360 only game.

He can bullshit all he likes about other reasons but thats why.

They all like to blame piracy on everything nowadays. Its not our fault that the port they made for GOW 1 was **** which forced people to dl it first before they spent their hard earned money!
Quote lewchenko 30th September 2008, 11:06
DougEdey is spot on. This is truly about economics. GOW 1 just didnt sell on the PC. There were 3 reasons for that :

1. Most people had bought / played it on a console already, so werent interested in a PC version.
2. It was technically flawed, with bad rumors from day 1 of install and technical issues.
3. Piracy. Yep, Im sure it was pirated to hell as well.

Pirates will always steal the games, but these people are not your target market anyway.. its the other few hundred thousand people they need to convince that DO PAY that they had to convince the game was worthy.. and they failed.

So why on earth would they bother releasing GOW 2 for the PC ? They would probably make a loss, not probably due to piracy but simply because people just arent that interested in the game (the mass public that is, not the odd bit-tech reader who is).
Quote lewchenko 30th September 2008, 11:08
Oh.. and as you can buy a 360 for the price of a low end video card these days... just pick up a 360 and be done with it. (£129 for an arcade model capable of playing GOW2)
Quote Hamish 30th September 2008, 11:15
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewchenko

1. Most people had bought / played it on a console already, so werent interested in a PC version.
2. It was technically flawed, with bad rumors from day 1 of install and technical issues.
3. Piracy. Yep, Im sure it was pirated to hell as well.

1 and 2 contribute to 3 here imo
people who've already bought it on xbox are extremely unlikely to buy it again on PC, unless they're super fanboys or something :p
people who heard rumours that it was buggy and unstable are unlikely to go and buy it without trying it first
Quote Deadwolf 30th September 2008, 11:51
Kill adult PC-gamers interest, kill the revenue that supports their child's xbox purchases.. at least thats the way i see it..
Quote mikeuk2004 30th September 2008, 11:54
im sure it will come to PC, all game developers say they are not, and then in the end they do. ITs their PR lies.
Quote tejas 30th September 2008, 11:56
I will say a few things in rebuttal at CliffyB. Firstly console games are typically overpriced £50- £60 and let me tell you that in the context of the failed $700 billion bailout in the US (as of 30 Sept 2008) , that Epic will NOT SELL even 1.5 million copies of Gears of War 2. For comparison they sold 5 million of the original. People don't have enough money to eat, forget about playing bloody games. In fact I laugh as this game will flop due to the economic conditions and Epic will CRAWL BACK to us PC gamers. Same thing goes for Crytek and their whining about piracy and new found love for the consoles. PC gaming is due for a major resurrection due to games being cheaper on that platform.

However I blame Microsoft... They could have used their power and money to make the PC the only relevant platform. Instead Ballmer and Gates decided to take on Nintendo and Sony (PS3 failure).... and look what Nintendo did with the Wii.... totally pwned the 360..
Quote Silver51 30th September 2008, 12:03
Every time I hear Epic and piracy in a sentence, I think of the phrase "bulls**t munchers..."
Quote DougEdey 30th September 2008, 12:17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadwolf
Kill adult PC-gamers interest, kill the revenue that supports their child's xbox purchases.. at least thats the way i see it..

Good, a child should NEVER play Gears of War
Quote OWNED66 30th September 2008, 12:25
ehhhh ??
i download xbox360 games online
and buy copies from stores

so whats the diffrence
Quote BlackMage23 30th September 2008, 12:32
some shooter games work on the console if the team has been carful with the controls, but having a keyboard and mouse would make such a difference for the better.
Quote shigllgetcha 30th September 2008, 12:40
itll come out eventually. they just people that have a pc and 360 to buy the 360 version because they dont expect there to ever b a pc version as the 360 is dearer and less chance of piracy, ie more profit

then release a pc version to scoop up anyone that hasnt bought the pc version and make a smaller profit on the pc version just to sqeeze the last few pounds out of the game
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 12:41
LOL, everytime CliffyB or Epic and ID speak it sounds like a bitter developer because they are no longer amongst the elite PC devs, so they spin it as the PC platform is the issue and turn to console out of necessity. Does Epic know it is 2008? Why do they keep harping on Integrated Chips? Anyone who games has a video card, and there are plenty of PC's capable of playing GEars better then 360. Stalker, Crysis and countless others has no issues selling millions. The 8800 Series came out in 06 for gods sakes and milions of them alone were sold.

They release a Console focused arcade shooter with cheesy one liners and no story and repetitive gameplay 1 year late on PC with many bugs and wonder why it didn't sell well? Pc gamers have different standards and tastes Cliffy.

Cliffy, why do other High end games have no issue on PC? Explain that? Maybe, just maybe Gears is not all u think it is. it is a game that appeals to console gamers, Pc gamers do not think it is that good. Then you try and twist that into it being a hardware issue, BS.
Quote ChaosDefinesOrder 30th September 2008, 12:43
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo_mcg
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS DON'T WORK ON CONSOLES!
/rant

*sigh*

Seriously, console gamepads are not suited to FPS games, even watching someone who has played waaaay too much Halo/Gears etc you can still see that the view motion is jerky.

Mouse is far superior for freelook controlling, which suits it to PC better.

As i learned yesterday gow is infact 3rd person and tbh 3rd person does work ok on consoles but i've never liked it on pc i can't get my head round it even gt3 was a bit of a problem for me.

I should have made it clearer what I meant - Any game with a permenant crosshair (as opposed to just during manual aim) and/or no auto-aim or lock-on should come under the same bracket - and therefore is NOT suited for a console gamepad. Precision aiming is an arse with an analog stick.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 12:44
Why are these idiots a part of the Pc gaming alliance again?
Quote breathlesstao 30th September 2008, 12:48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
LOL, everytime CliffyB or Epic and ID speak it sounds like a bitter developer because they are no longer amongst the elite PC devs, so they spin it as the PC platform is the issue and turn to console out of necessity. Does Epic know it is 2008? Why do they keep harping on Integrated Chips? Anyone who games has a video card, and there are plenty of PC's capable of playing GEars better then 360. Stalker, Crysis and countless others has no issues selling millions. The 8800 Series came out in 06 for gods sakes and milions of them alone were sold.

They release a Console focused arcade shooter with cheesy one liners and no story and repetitive gameplay 1 year late on PC with many bugs and wonder why it didn't sell well? Pc gamers have different standards and tastes Cliffy.

Cliffy, why do other High end games have no issue on PC? Explain that? Maybe, just maybe Gears is not all u think it is. it is a game that appeals to console gamers, Pc gamers do not think it is that good. Then you try and twist that into it being a hardware issue, BS.

2nded. Totally. Along with what reflux said as well; only addition: someone PLEASE shove a #&@+!% rocket down Cliff's throat. Or better yet, up his arse, then fire it to deep space.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 12:50
Does Epic know it i 2008 and no longer is a high end PC required to play consoles ports very well? Hell, a lower priced 5-600 dollar PC can max out almost any console game these days.
Quote breathlesstao 30th September 2008, 12:52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
Does Epic know it i 2008 and no longer is a high end PC required to play consoles ports very well? Hell, a lower priced 5-600 dollar PC can max out almost any console game these days.

How would they know? They've been too busy blaming everything on piracy to notice.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 12:54
Quote:
Originally Posted by breathlesstao
How would they know? They've been too busy blaming everything on piracy to notice.

True. Funny how the only ones complaining (ID and Epic) have lost thier place as a top Pc dev, sounds like sour grapes to me, so they move to console out of necessity and bitterness. You cannot expect to get great sales when you release the same game on PC 1 year after, come on.
Quote Gunsmith 30th September 2008, 12:56
**** EPIC!
Quote AlexB 30th September 2008, 12:56
Cliff is a Dick.
Quote DaMightyMouse 30th September 2008, 12:58
Bleh whatever no big loss to me ...
Quote breathlesstao 30th September 2008, 13:00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
Quote:
Originally Posted by breathlesstao
How would they know? They've been too busy blaming everything on piracy to notice.

True. Funny how the only ones complaining (ID and Epic) have lost thier place as a top Pc dev, sounds like sour grapes to me, so they move to console out of necessity and bitterness. You cannot expect to get great sales when you release the same game on PC 1 year after, come on.

That, and I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out M$ and/or Sony just "support" developers catering for their respective consoles. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised even if we learnt one day that all this crap is just a twisted ad campaign funded by them console manufacturers.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 13:04
Lets not forget consoles are one big marketing money brab, the more they sell on console the more MS and Sony gets. Anther reason i am not a big fan of consoles, don't get me wrong, nothing wrong with games on them, but I don't like the business side of them at all. MS and Sony pay money to try and froce people to buy for their platform, excluding many gamers, like the DLC for GTA 4, gamers only lsoe in those situations. it is to bad the majority of the public are naive, the overpriced games just put more money in Ms and Sony;s pockets. PC gaming is not near as expensive as people like u to believe.

How much u want to bet MS had a say in this so they can get yet more money? MS does more to hurt PC gaming then help it, as does Epic, yet both are in the PC gaming alliance.

it is no secret companies like MS are helping fund these games so they stay on their platform.

On another note, Pc gamers are not missing out on much anyway, gears was one of the more dissappointing games I have played. Seemed like ti was targeting teenagers. Far Cry 2, Crysis Warhead and Stalker Clear sky (With patches, lol), not really missing out on much TBH.
Quote breathlesstao 30th September 2008, 13:12
Well, I for one, have never had any console at all. And honestly, I couldn't care less about what's behind the scenes if they weren't always RANTING about below-expected sales and such (as if they didn't have enough money...) - where does all the passion for creating an experience goes to and why, once someone makes a name for themselves?
Piracy? **** it, try NOT to overprice the freakin' games AND try NOT to make gamers' lives hell with so-called "anti-piracy" methods - I bet anything they'd see such a steep increase in sales they'd get a heart attack.
Quote rollo 30th September 2008, 13:15
to be blunt. Gears of war was buggy pos that struggled to install on any vista based machine. And still to this day isnt 100% correct. The pc port was still better than the orginal on the 360 was ( got the orginal for £8 from a 2nd hand stall)
Quote johnnyboy700 30th September 2008, 13:19
Cheeky bugger how dare he suggest that all PC gamers are tarred with the piracy brush just because we spend our hard earned cash on buying modern games. I can honestly say that I have never pirated a game, or a DVD for that matter, and I never will.
Quote Grasshopper 30th September 2008, 13:33
I wish I live in USA so I can sue his a** out his nose.
Any way, the console gaming will die sooner or later any way :)
Quote hawky84 30th September 2008, 13:42
what a tosser, just because I know how to build a PC and know how to use BitTorrent, how dare he label me as a games pirate. Proper w@nker
Quote Jordan Wise 30th September 2008, 14:04
I love laughing at this tactic that Epic (apparently in the PCGA) are taking against the biggest of issues in PC Gaming, piracy. Fear not PC gamers, Epic will deliver us all from the evil of piracy, by not bothering to make games at all. It stands to reason, how can you pirate games for a platform that doesn't exist? Mwahahahaha!
Quote Kúsař 30th September 2008, 14:18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
True. Funny how the only ones complaining (ID and Epic) have lost thier place as a top Pc dev...

ID? Where did you get it? They were always talking about piracy yet they were always supportive towards PC gaming. They never resorted to any form of intrusive DRM. And they always release SDK for their games. Who would push evolution of PC gaming(technology) forward if not Johny Carmack & iD? Whining Crytek? .......

On topic - if Epic were focusing on PC as primary platform they wouldn't have suffered that much(GoW). Console ports are in 90% beggars limited by poor controls, graphics or something else due lack of proper testing or insufficient effort...(opposite to this is Valve's port to PS3 aka "Waste of everyone's time")
Quote WILD9 30th September 2008, 14:23
The guy is a PR disaster area. Epic slowly but surely built a successfull company off of the back of PCs and PC gamers, releasing endless iterations of Unreal which are bought by their loyal fan base. Surely they must be aware that without PCs and PC gamers they wouldnt exist, Cliffy B's defining moment would probably be a subroutine in some piece of accountancy software no one has ever heard of. Instead of paying tribute to the platform and people that brought him everything he has and has allowed him to have what im pretty sure is a 'dream job' he basically accuses everyone with a high end PC of being a software pirate and declares repeatedly that the PC is a dead platform. Im sure cliff knows his way around a PC so does he place himself in that demographic of PC literate software pirates or is that just something us lower people who havn't made millions off of an industry we are now trying to shoot down in flames do? The man is a greedy ungratefull weasel that cant resist the bright lights of consoleville with £50 a pop games.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 14:24
Where you been, ID have said they will no longer focus on PC, and their gamnes will be console focused with Pc being nehind nintendo as a focus, maybe because ID has not made a good game in over a decade they don't sell well? Another dev whining about PC when the Real issue is there are simp,y better devs and games available. Average games sell well on console (Force unleashed, Assassins Creed), PC gamers have higher standards. Id and Epic are using piracy and the Pc platform as a scapegoat.
Quote naokaji 30th September 2008, 14:29
high end pc to play games? for what reason?

a E7200, a radeon 4850, a p35 board and 2 GB ddr2 dont even come close to high end and are allready more than enough for every game except crysis.

no pc version due to piracy? what a logic, zero percent piracy on the pc version of gow2, we won, oh wait, we didnt make a single cent either as we didnt sell it.

and no, I'd never buy a console, the day there are no more pc games i'll simply quit gaming.
Quote Kúsař 30th September 2008, 14:40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
Where you been, ID have said they will no longer focus on PC, and their gamnes will be console focused with Pc being nehind nintendo as a focus...

Can you post link to back up this statement?
So far, I know they're planning Doom4, hiring another developers and that Linux ports of their future games are low priority. Not a single word about consoles...
Quote wuyanxu 30th September 2008, 14:41
Epic will never get a single penny out of my wallet!

in fact, i will make sure i pirate ALL Unreal Engine games whenever possible, and i'll try to provide my friends around me, pirated Epic related games. i'll also be sure to create lots copy of xbox360 GoW2 from turrents when that's released. console games can be just as easily pirated.

their behaviour is unacceptable, makes me wonder why they are still in the PC gaming alliance. im going to buy myself a second copy of Solar Empire to support StarDock.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 14:44
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/john-carmack-rage,6074.html

Carmack along with Epic are idiots, sorry.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 14:44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kúsař
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepermessiah
Where you been, ID have said they will no longer focus on PC, and their gamnes will be console focused with Pc being nehind nintendo as a focus...

Can you post link to back up this statement?
So far, I know they're planning Doom4, hiring another developers and that Linux ports of their future games are low priority. Not a single word about consoles...


http://www.tomshardware.com/news/john-carmack-rage,6074.html

A quick google search. Carmack has said they wioll no longer focus oN PC, consoles first, PC after thought.
Quote Noostroi 30th September 2008, 14:50
TBH, I think Epic lost the way when they released ut2004...

It was a mediocre increment to ut2003, and imo broke a lot of the feel of the game - the movement dynamics changed, so you could no longer do some of the more outrageous jumps.

I played ut2007 at a lan once, and it just didn't feel the same. :(
Quote n8dude 30th September 2008, 14:51
Guess that means that UT3 was the last game I ever bought from epic. I remember when epic was one of my favorite companies. I miss the good ole' days.
Quote Kúsař 30th September 2008, 14:56
TG: Is id planning any console exclusives?

JOHN CARMACK: We certainly expect Rage and the Doom project on the PC. We're contractually obligated to have Rage on the PC, and I would be stunned if we did not do Doom 4 for the PC. It would just be wrong. Even if it was a marginal business case, we would still do it because it's the right thing to do.

...doesn't sound like they don't care about PC gamming to me.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 15:02
Amm, getting console ports is not what we want from ID, they have totally switched focus from Pc first to console first and PC after, whcih means we get the lowest common denominator console ports. Bug difference. They state Console is the focus, there will be a PC version, but it will be a console conversion. Yawn.
Quote ComputerKing 30th September 2008, 15:17
I totally agree with every one said **** EPIC, AND **** GEARS OF ****!

PC gaming is everything. Not consoles you idiots epic workers. and yeah GOW1 was bull **** on pc. I had to restart after I play it. and was pain in the ass to install.

Download games? lol. I download the game to try it. if I like it I buy it. if not I don't, do they think that money come easy ? ****ing retarded.
Quote fathazza 30th September 2008, 15:52
epic made such a piss poor conversion of GoW that i actually had to crack it to get my legitimate copy to work! And then they have the gumption to go on about piracy! Muppets.
Quote zimbloggy 30th September 2008, 16:34
"Here's the problem right now; the person who is savvy enough to want to have a good PC to upgrade their video card, is a person who is savvy enough to know bit torrent to know all the elements so they can pirate software. Therefore, high-end videogames are suffering very much on the PC."

I guess that they are saying that people that use consoles are technological imbeciles who don't know how to use the internet.
Quote jim48509 30th September 2008, 16:44
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8dude
Guess that means that UT3 was the last game I ever bought from epic. I remember when epic was one of my favorite companies. I miss the good ole' days.

Exactly
Quote Daniel114 30th September 2008, 16:48
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimbloggy
"Here's the problem right now; the person who is savvy enough to want to have a good PC to upgrade their video card, is a person who is savvy enough to know bit torrent to know all the elements so they can pirate software. Therefore, high-end videogames are suffering very much on the PC."

I guess that they are saying that people that use consoles are technological imbeciles who don't know how to use the internet.

I really don't get why he said that, its such an ill-thought out statement. Ofcourse their savvy enough, it doesn't mean that they'd do it. No one looked at banning fertilizer when Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Building. 'Yeah, we had a good run on that whole crop growing thing, but I just can't trust that your going to actually use this for what its intended for, so best just to not sell it'.

Have some faith in humanity,

Game designer isn't fat, bald and in glasses, thinks he's Jesus Christ, twunt.

Edit:

Wait, wait, wait....

'Epic Fail!'

Too late?
Quote ComputerKing 30th September 2008, 16:54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel114
Game designer isn't fat, bald and in glasses, thinks he's Jesus Christ, twunt.

You are kidding me right? :(
Quote kevon27 30th September 2008, 16:58
I believe the only thing holding PC gamers back from turning totally to console gaming is the lack of keyboard and mouse support.
If support was added to popular FPS's and RTS's, 90 percent of PC gamers would switch to consoles.
Console = a cheaper gaming experience. No constant video card and processor upgrades.
Quote Lepermessiah 30th September 2008, 17:09
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevon27
I believe the only thing holding PC gamers back from turning totally to console gaming is the lack of keyboard and mouse support.
If support was added to popular FPS's and RTS's, 90 percent of PC gamers would switch to consoles.
Console = a cheaper gaming experience. No constant video card and processor upgrades.



Utter bull crap, you have no clue what you are talking about. Constant upgrades? On what planet? There is a large market for people who like tweaking and upgrading, that is something console gamers just don't understand, and K/M is only one SMALL reason people like gaming on PC.
Quote steveo_mcg 30th September 2008, 17:15
For once i agree with leper, there are a dozen reason i'm not interested in consoles one is the keyboard one is the fact that i don't get to use my telly (wifes rules). Being tied to a restricted platform goes against my open source sensibilities, no (real) access to the indy gaming scene, rapidly dating hardware, the ability to do other things than game on the machine (photo editing) the list really goes on and on.

Realistically consoles are only significantly cheaper compared to a mid end pc at the end of the their life cycle once you include buying games etc and by then your stuck with gfx that look like they did 5 years ago.
Quote MajestiX 30th September 2008, 17:16
don't you just pirate on the xbox as well and don't have to deal with cd keys and stuff?
Quote ComputerKing 30th September 2008, 17:55
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajestiX
don't you just pirate on the xbox as well and don't have to deal with cd keys and stuff?

that what I was thinking on.

360 guys just download and burn. not like pc... so how the hell that not counted piracy :(
Quote Ghys 30th September 2008, 18:11
For the past year I have been mad at Epic for ripping me off with the total POS that UT3 was/is. Now I am starting to just find it sad that every time they have something to say, it turns into a massive bitching of how terribly bad persons their former and potential customers are.

Release a good quality product and people will PAY for it. If you are so afraid of piracy then why don't you release your game(s) on Steam ! I know I have never pirated a game that was only available on Steam. Actually, yes I did. It was HL2 and the cracked version that was available on the net was buggy as hell and the artificial intelligence was missing at many points of the game. I then bought the game in store and activated it on Steam. Well guess what Epic , 2 years later I BOUGHT THE EXTENSION BECAUSE IT WAS A GOOD GAME AND I WAS SATISFIED BY IT. The next year I bought the Orange Box and I now have all the recent Valve games.

Epic and many other game developers could learn from Valve
Quote maha_x 30th September 2008, 18:56
Quote:
Originally Posted by PQuiff

Well here to Cliffy. lets hope hes a man of his word and a half arsed PC conversion doesn't crawl out the door a few years down the line when no one cares.


haha! my toughts excatly!
Quote knyghtryda 30th September 2008, 19:00
Damn... CliffyB used to be totally PC-centric and backed the platform exclusively. What the hell happened? It all seemed to fall apart after UT 2k4, which I think is still their best game of the entire series. Hey... I bought it, and I bought UT before that as well. Here that CliffyB? People buy good games. Make a game the same league as your past hits and trust me, people will BUY. Don't just rehash the gameplay a little and slap a new engine on it though (ala UT3), cuz thats not a new game, thats just making a sports franchise.
Yeah... us PC people are a finicky bunch when it comes to quality, but we are also extremely loyal to a developer and their products. Get one good game out and you're pretty much guaranteed at least one later purchase, if not many more. Just looking at my stack of Blizzard, Chris Taylor (Cavedog, GPG), and Valve games makes that pretty obvious.
Quote Vash-HT 30th September 2008, 20:01
I torrented GoW because I already had it for the 360 and beat it. The PC version sucked, being forced to use windows liv