Testing Methods:
With the exception of SiSoft Sandra, all of our benchmarks have been engineered to give you numbers that you are likely to find useful when actually using the products we have evaluated in the real world.
We are also focusing a lot more of our time on evaluating the stability of the motherboards (and platforms) using a stress test designed to highlight any of the potential weaknesses that the product may have. That involves a gradually increasing amount of stress starting with Prime95 and expanding to IOMeter and an endless loop of Far Cry loop if all is well. This is to ensure that all parts of the system are stressed simultaneously over a period of time.
We believe that the consumer is never likely to subject their platform to this level of stress and we are not expecting every product to complete an entire extended stress test. However, most poorly engineered products fail within the first couple of hours, or even minutes, allowing us to make a conscious decision on whether a motherboard (or platform) is worth your money, regardless of how well it performs in our benchmarks.
Test Setup:
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 (operating at 2.93GHz - 11x266); 2x 1GB OCZ FlexXLC 9200 (running at DDR2-800 in dual channel with 3.0-3-3-9 timings); Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX; Seagate 7200.9 200GB 7200RPM SATA 3Gbps hard disk drive; OCZ GameXStream 700W power supply unit; Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2; DirectX 9.0c; Nvidia Forceware 93.71WHQL, AMD Catalyst 6.12 WHQL, Intel 8.1.1.1010 Inf Drivers;
Systems:
- EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI (680i LT SLI);
- Inno3D nForce 680i SLI (680i SLI);
- Asus Striker Extreme (680i SLI);
- Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus (650i/MCP55);
- MSI P6N SLI Platinum (650i SLI);
- DFI LANParty UT ICFX3200 T2R/G (RD600);
- Asus Commando (P965);
- Intel Desktop Board D975XBX2 (975X);
Want to comment? Please log in.