Social publishing site Scribd
has found itself under legal attack with a law firm accusing the site of facilitating massive copyright infringement - but there's a twist.
As reported over on CNet
, the site - which allows users to upload written documentation either for free or for sale - is accused by law firm Camara & Sibley of building a technology "that's broken barriers to copyright infringement on a global scale and in the process [has] also built one of the largest readerships in the world,
" which allows the company to allegedly "shamelessly [profit] from the stolen copyrighted works of innumerable authors.
While on the surface the suit would appear to be identical to those carried out on so many other sites previously, it's the identity of the law firm which offers the interesting twist: Camara & Sibley is the firm responsible for defending accused file sharer Jammie Thomas-Rasset after she found herself being sued
by the US music industry for millions of dollars in damages.
While the move might seem contrary on the surface, it's not uncommon for lawyers to argue both sides of this sort of issue: back in July Joe Sibley told CNet's Greg Sandoval that he and Kiwi Camara could easily see themselves doing just this if they believed in the issue brought forward by the industry. Clearly, author's rights are just such an issue.
The catalyst for the suit appears to have been author Elaine Scott, who found a copy of her book Stocks and Bonds: Profits and Losses, a Quick Look at Financial Markets
uploaded to the site without her permission and downloaded by more than 100 individual users. However, the firm is looking for class action status in order to represent "every author who owns a valid registered copyright in a work infringed by Scribd,
" a site the firm describes as "YouTube for documents.
Neither Scribd nor Camara & Sibley has commented on the suit thus far, but it would appear that a filtering system developed by the company to prevent materials flagged as infringing copyright from being re-uploaded once removed isn't enough with the law firm stating that "apparently [Scribd and other West Coast start-ups] believe any business may misappropriate and then publish intellectual proprety, as long as it ceases to use a stolen work when an author complains.
Do you believe that authors have a legitimate case against Scribd and other similar document sharing sites, or is the filtering system and complaint mechanism in place at the site enough to defend the company? Share your thoughts over in the forums