If you're tired of unreliable WiFi connections but still want to do your browsing sans wires, the common light fitting might offer some hope for the future.
According to
Cellular News, a team at Boston University's College of Engineering is currently working on the ability to use LED lighting as a data communication channel, removing the need for a tethering wire while cleaning up the radio-frequency spectrum at the same time.
Professor Thomas Little paints a picture of a world where “
your computer, iPhone, TV, radio and thermostat could all communicate with you when you walked in a room just by flipping the wall light switch and without the usual cluster of wires,” - so far, so WiFi. Where the project differs is in the use of visible light rather than radio waves: Little describes the system as “
an LED-based communications network that also provides light - all over existing power lines with low power consumption, high reliability and no electromagnetic interference. Ultimately, the system is expected to be applicable from existing illumination devices, like swapping light bulbs for LEDs.”
While the project
could feasibly work, there's a certain amount of assumption involved here: firstly, that we “
switch from incandescent and compact florescent lighting to LEDs in the coming years” as a ubiquitous source of LED-based lighting is necessary for the system to work; secondly, that we're happy to have said LED lights turned on
during the day.
While the speeds currently offered by the system – a projected 10Mb/s for the early generations – aren't anything to get excited about it's a system that certainly shows promise. Whether it would ever tempt anyone away from the now nearly ubiquitous radio-frequency based wireless networking technologies will remain to be seen – although the increased privacy available by simply drawing your curtains might have the paranoiacs enjoying wireless networking for the first time.
Would you be tempted by visible-light networking, or is it wireless networking already solved by current RF-based technologies? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
Want to comment? Please log in.
Posted by liratheal - Wed Oct 08 2008 11:56
Posted by Goty - Wed Oct 08 2008 12:10
Seriously, why do we pay these people? I want to get paid to come up with impractical solutions to problems that don't exist!
Posted by DougEdey - Wed Oct 08 2008 12:14
Posted by Krikkit - Wed Oct 08 2008 12:19
The problem with using visible (or even near-visible) light is that it's very easy to interfere with.
I can see what they're trying for with this one, but I'm a sceptic until further notice tbh.