Audio Performance

The audio performance tests were done using Audio Rightmark 6.0.5 and a 3.5mm gold plated, oxygen free stereo loop back cable between stereo out and microphone input. Results were taken at the DVD sample rate of 16-bit/48KHz and High Definition 24-bit/96KHz.

What we're looking for:

  • Noise Level: A higher negative is better. This is usually viewed in relation to a signal level which provides a signal to noise ratio. As you get closer to zero there's more noise and lesser audio fidelity.
  • Frequency Response: Two values listing how close to the lower higher frequencies the codec can reach. If it hits them perfectly it'll display a 0, 0.
  • Dynamic Range: The difference between the loudest and quietest sounds the codec can make before it distorts them. The larger the gap, the better.
  • THD and IMD percentage: Closer to zero is better. THD and IMD are best looked at together, where as if you have a lot of THD and not much IMD, then it'll offer a warmer accurate sound. High THD and IMD provides a warm, inaccurate sound, low THD and high IMD gives a cold inaccurate sound and finally low THD and IMD gives a cold accurate sound.
  • IMD = intermodulation distortion and is a fancy way of saying conversion interpolation, which is a basic detection of the quality loss after an analogue to digital then digital to analogue conversion. By comparing it to a highly compressed source it shows up problems with the codec and converters.
  • THD = total harmonic distortion, which shows up unwanted harmonics; integer multiples of the original component sound that can be second, third, fourth degrees or overtones for example.
  • Stereo Crosstalk: where the stereo channels "talk" to each other and interact. Ideally you want them entirely separate, unmixed or echoed in either channel, so a higher negative a result as possible is preferred.

16-bit / 48KHz

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results

24-bit / 96KHz

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results

Bear in mind that RMAA is dependent on the quality of input more than output since recording fidelity is usually lower and the test loops back a stereo output signal back into the line-in port. In that regard, we expect the Creative card to fair worse simply because its recording hardware is poorer than Asus’s. What's surprising is that Asus Xonar DX comes out better than the more expensive D2X, obtaining a perfect score in 24-bit / 96KHz testing. The specific results are low and all the cards are better at working with High-Definition sound than CD or DVD quality audio.

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results
Noise Level (SNR)

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results
Dynamic Range

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results
Frequency Response

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results
Intermodulation Destortion

Asus Xonar DX Rightmark Audio Analysis Results
THD + Noise (at -3 dB FS)

Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04