Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition Review

Written by Clive Webster

June 22, 2009 | 09:17

Tags: #920 #965 #975 #benchmark #comparison #core-i7 #crazy-but-cool #extreme-edition #lga1366 #overclocking #performance

Companies: #ee #intel #test

Custom PC Media Benchmarks 2007

Gimp and Handbrake tests

Download from: www.custompc.co.uk/benchmarks

Custom PC, bit-tech's sister magazine, has developed its own Media Benchmarks to simulate the tasks that most of us perform on a regular basis. There are three tests, each of which measure different aspects of a PC's performance.

You can download the suite from the link above, and submit your score to the benchmark leaderboard to see how your PC compares with those of others.

The scores are normalised against a reference PC that includes a stock-speed Core 2 Duo E6700, 2GB of DDR2 memory and a fast P45 motherboard, as you can see below. This PC scores 1,000 points, so if your PC scores 1,300, it's 30 per cent faster than the reference system, and if it scores less than 1,000 points, it's slower.

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition Review Real World Performance - Custom PC benchmarks

Image editing with Gimp

Website: www.gimp.org
Far from being some kind of pr0n-filtering tool, Gimp is an open source image editing application - Gimp is an acronym of GNU Image Manipulation Program. Our test simulates how well a PC can manipulate a collection of large digital photos, and to achieve a low time requires a PC with a powerful CPU, plenty of quick memory and efficient hard disk drive access.

GIMP Image Editing Test

Custom PC Benchmark

  • Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition
  • Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition
  • Intel Core i7-920
  • AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition
    • 1475
    • 1888
    • 1441
    • 1844
    • 1167
    • 1733
    • 1048
    • 1247
0
500
1000
1500
2000
points (higheris better)
  • Stock Speed
  • Overclocked

With memory performance as well as CPU processing power tested here, it's no surprise to see the Core i7s outstrip the Phenom II by some margin. The 955 BE again keeps the Core i7 920 honest at stock speeds, but can't keep up when both are overclocked. However, notice how well the £195 955 BE does against the £750 965 EE - it's only 13 per cent slower but costs almost four times less.

The lead of the 975 EE over the 965 EE is slender, either at stock speeds or when both are overclocked.

Video encoding with Handbrake

Website: http://handbrake.fr
We use the open-source, GPL-licensed, multi-platform, multi-threaded video encoder Handbrake to encode a HD video using the H.264 codec. This primarily tests multi-threaded CPU and memory subsystem performance.

Handbrake Video Encoding Test

Custom PC Benchmark

  • Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition
  • Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition
  • Intel Core i7-920
  • AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition
    • 2684
    • 3411
    • 2572
    • 3310
    • 2136
    • 3177
    • 1682
    • 1987
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
points (higheris better)
  • Stock Speed
  • Overclocked

The Hyper-Threading of the Core i7 CPUs give them a big lead over the AMD 955 BE when encoding video - you have to overclock your 955 BE to 3.8GHz to get the performance of a Core i7 at 2.66GHz, for example. Again, we see the 975 EE maintain a slight lead over the 965 EE at stock and overclocked speeds.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04