BFG Tech GeForce GTX 260 OCX Maxcore

Written by Tim Smalley

September 25, 2008 | 12:02

Tags: #216 #260 #4870 #bfg #core #evaluation #geforce #gtx #hd #max #maxcore #ocx #overclocking #performance #processor #radeon #review #scaling #shader #stream

Companies: #bfg-tech #test

How we tested

As always, we did our best to deliver a clean set of benchmarks, with each test repeated three times and an average of those results is what we’re reporting here. In the rare case where performance was inconsistent, we continued repeating the test until we got three results that were consistent.

The tests performed are a mixture of custom in-game timedemos and manually played sections with FRAPS to record the average and minimum frame rates. We strive to not only record real-world performance you will actually see, but also present the results in a manner that is easy to digest.

Nvidia Test System

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (operating at 3.00GHz – 9x333MHz); XFX nForce 780i SLI motherboard (with two PCI-Express 2.0 x16 slots); 2x 2GB Corsair XMS2-6400C5 (operating in dual channel at DDR2-800 5-5-5-12-1T); Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 200GB SATA hard drive; Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W PSU; Windows Vista Ultimate x86-64 (with Service Pack 1); Nvidia 15.17 nForce drivers.

Graphics cards

  • BFG Tech GeForce GTX 260 OCX Maxcore 896MB - operating at 655/1,404/2,250MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 1GB - operating at 602/1,296/2,214MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Zotac Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 AMP! 896MB - operating at 650/1,400/2,100MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB - operating at 600/1,500/2,000MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+ 512MB - operating at 738/1,836/2,200MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB - operating at 675/1,688/2,200MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta
  • Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 512MB - operating at 600/1,500/2,000MHz using Forceware 177.92 beta



ATI Test System

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (operating at 3.00GHz – 9x333MHz); Asus Maximus Formula motherboard (Intel X38 Express with two PCI-Express 2.0 x16 slots); 2x 2GB Corsair XMS2-6400C5 (operating in dual channel at DDR2-800 5-5-5-12-1T); Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 200GB SATA hard drive; Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W PSU; Windows Vista Ultimate x86-64 (with Service Pack 1); Intel inf 8.3.0 WHQL.

Graphics cards

  • Powercolor ATI Radeon HD 4850 PCS+ 512MB - operating at 665/1,986MHz using Catalyst 8.8 WHQL
  • AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB - operating at 750/3,600MHz using Catalyst 8.8 WHQL
  • AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB - operating at 750/3,600MHz using Catalyst 8.8 WHQL
  • AMD ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB - operating at 625/2,000MHz using Catalyst 8.8 WHQL
  • AMD ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB - operating at 825/1,800MHz using Catalyst 8.8 WHQL

Games Tested

  • Crysis, version 1.21 (64-bit) with DirectX 10 and DirectX 9.0
  • Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, version 1.6 with DirectX 9.0
  • World in Conflict, version 1.007 with DirectX 10
  • Devil May Cry 4, version 1.0 with DirectX 10
  • Half-Life 2: Episode Two, with DirectX 9.0
  • Race Driver: GRID, version 1.2 with DirectX 9

Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Hustler - Thu Sep 25 2008 11:45

So the price in the US is about $350 inc tax.

The price in the UK is about $450. inc tax.

Just how long do we have to subsidise the US consumer????

Posted by Guest-16 - Thu Sep 25 2008 11:53

Hustler
So the price in the US is about $350 inc tax.

The price in the UK is about $450. inc tax.

Just how long do we have to subsidise the US consumer????
It doesn't work like that - the cost of delivery and support in the UK is far higher than the US. The population and potential market in the US is several fold higher than the UK so there is economies of scale, and in the US the tax depends on what state you are in. Simply put, as you're well aware, the cost of living in the UK is far greater.

Posted by Tim S - Thu Sep 25 2008 12:08

If you take the UK price without tax, it's not that much more than the US price.

Posted by wyx087 - Thu Sep 25 2008 13:18

£250 is a bit expensive.

if the price were £220 to compete with 4870 1GB, this would win easily. but nVidia has put this right in the middle of gtx280 and old gtx260, which this isn't, it's closer to gtx260. so it should be around £220.

what people don't remember is that nVidia also has the GPGPU capacity, and even when its a little bit worse in some gaming performance, at £20 more, it's still great value
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.