System Cost versus Performancet
Please note, we did not feel the need to unify the clock speeds on the test systems - instead testing the fast, dual core CPUs at their default clock speed. This is because the CPU architectures - and therefore IGPs - cannot be directly compared clock for clock. 
  
  
    - 
      Intel GMA HD (Core i5 661: 900MHz IGP)
    
- 
      Intel GMA HD (Core i3 530: 733MHz IGP)
    
- 
      Nvidia GeForce 9400 (Core 2 Duo E8500)
    
- 
      AMD 785G (Phenom II X2 550 BE)
    
- 
      ATI Radeon HD 5450 (Phenom II X2 550 BE)
    
    
    
      
        0
      
      
        250
      
      
        500
      
      
        750
      
      
        1000
      
      
        1250
      
      
        1500
      
     
   
  Sorted by Overall Score
  
 
So, on a media benchmark baseline, it's clear that the total performance is unaffected by the addition of a graphics card, despite removing the competitive demand for memory access the IGP causes. The eight point difference is within a second or so experimental error between the three benchmarks: GIMP image edting, h.264 encoding and multitasking. As such, the Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition system with HD 5450 does not benefit, dropping the AMD system's cost:performance factor well below that of the Core i3 530 and original AMD 785G system.
  
  
    - 
      AMD 785G (Phenom II X2 550 BE)
    
- 
      Intel GMA HD (Core i3 530: 733MHz IGP)
    
- 
      ATI Radeon HD 5450 (Phenom II X2 550 BE)
    
- 
      Intel GMA HD (Core i5 661: 900MHz IGP)
    
- 
      Nvidia GeForce 9400 (Core 2 Duo E8500)
    
Higher is better
  
 
On the plus side however, adding a Radeon HD 5450 512MB still costs less than Core i5-661 and almost the same as a Core i3-530 system! OK, so it doesn't benefit your general productivity, but what about the Radeon HD 5450's primary designation: games and Blu-ray playback?
    
 
    
    
        
            
Want to comment? Please log in.