Gaming Performance
Average FPS (single card and SLI)
-
Asus Striker II Formula
-
Asus Striker Extreme
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
-
Asus Striker II Formula
-
Asus Striker Extreme
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Single GeForce 8800 GT
-
GeForce 8800 GT SLI
Despite the better memory performance on both Strikers, both of the ‘designed by Nvidia’ boards churn out marginally better FPS in both SLI and single card. PCI-Express 2.0 versus 1.1 again makes zero difference as do the "optimisations" the nF200 is apparently meant to offer (despite our limited cross section of games) but, generally speaking, you'd be hard pushed to notice any difference between the four boards.
Average and Minimum FPS (separate single card and SLI)
-
Asus Striker II Formula
-
Asus Striker Extreme
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Asus Striker II Formula
-
Asus Striker Extreme
-
XFX nForce 780i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
Frames Per Second - higher is better
Only in
World in Conflict with SLI enabled are we seeing a clear
two frames per second lead by the Strikers! Between the two though there's very little difference on average and the minimum and single card results are pretty even across the range of boards.
Want to comment? Please log in.