Biostar TF7050-M2

Written by Richard Swinburne

August 8, 2007 | 14:05

Tags: #690g #7050 #am2 #atx #hdcp #hdmi #igp #micro #motherboard #onboard #spdif

Companies: #amd #biostar

Gaming Platform Performance:


Call of Duty 2

1024x768, 0xAF, 0xAA, Maximum Details

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 87.3
  • 83.8
  • 88.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Quake 4

1024x768, 0xAF, 0xAA, Maximum Details

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 151.0
  • 151.1
  • 129.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Half Life 2 - Episode 1

1024x768, 0xAF, 0xAA, Maximum Details

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 103.9
  • 100.2
  • 92.2
0
25
50
75
100
Frames Per Second - higher is better

FEAR 1.08

1024x768, 0xAF, 0xAA, Maximum Details

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 98
  • 99
  • 118
0
25
50
75
100
125
Frames Per Second - higher is better

With a proper dedicated graphics card like our old faithful GeForce 7900 GTX, we were able to get a much more playable frame rate at the base line resolution but with maximum detail. In three out of the four games, the Biostar system performs exceptionally well and is a lot faster than at least one of the two other systems, whilst keeping up with the other. Only in F.E.A.R. do both AMD platforms drop significantly behind the MSI G965 system and even then it's only a single frame per second behind the MSI 690G.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04