Memory Performance:
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (IGP)
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (IGP)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI G965MDH (IGP)
-
MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
-
5546
-
6708
-
5091
-
6304
-
3976
-
4125
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
MB/s
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (IGP)
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (IGP)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI G965MDH (IGP)
-
MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
nanoseconds
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (IGP)
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (IGP)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI G965MDH (IGP)
-
MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
-
5340
-
6141
-
7076
-
7673
-
4975
-
5363
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MB/s
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (IGP)
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (IGP)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI G965MDH (IGP)
-
MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
-
5604
-
6708
-
6415
-
7321
-
3585
-
3631
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MB/s
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (IGP)
-
Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (IGP)
-
MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
-
MSI G965MDH (IGP)
-
MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
nanoseconds (lower is better)
Sisoft says the memory performance is better than the MSI, but Everest says no and gives the opposite result. Either way, they're both better than the MSI G965 motherboard which is limited to just 5-5-5-15 at 667MHz (there is no option to adjust the timings), unlike both the AMD systems which run at 800MHz 4-4-4-12. The latency of both are very similar and both lower than the Intel board as expected.
Want to comment? Please log in.