File Compression & Encryption:
Website: WinRAR
We used the Intel X25-M SSD to provide a uniform performance base between all the boards tested in file compression and decompression.
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
It's not great in file compression either - the Foxconn sits at the bottom of the table in both small and large file tests, although the performance difference is very little and unnoticeable in the real world.
File Decompression & Decryption:
The two RAR archives created during the compression and encryption tests were then decompressed and decrypted.
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
0
3
5.5
8
10.5
13
15.5
18
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
In decompression tests where the SATA performance is more of a factor than CPU and memory alone, the Foxconn performs better - matching the rest of the boards tested here.
Multitasking Performance
Website: MPC-HC
Website: 7Zip
To run multiple applications well you need a powerful (ideally multi-core) CPU and plenty of RAM. Our multitasking test performs a massive file backup (with encryption) using 7Zip, while simultaneously playing back a HD movie file using Media Player Classic, making it a seriously demanding test for any PC.
-
Foxconn Blood Rage
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
-
MSI Eclipse SLI
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
-
Asus P6T Deluxe
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
In complete contrast to the rest of the tests, the multi-tasking one was consistently in favour of the Blood Rage by a few seconds.
Want to comment? Please log in.