Memory Performance:
-
Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
-
MSI K9A2 CF
-
Asus M2N32-SLI
-
Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
-
MSI K9A2 CF
-
Asus M2N32-SLI
nanoseconds (lower is better)
-
Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
-
MSI K9A2 CF
-
Asus M2N32-SLI
-
7166.3
-
6644.3
-
7284.2
-
7316.8
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MB/s
-
Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
-
MSI K9A2 CF
-
Asus M2N32-SLI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
nanoseconds (lower is better)
1T was also unattainable for stable running – in the end we could only squeeze out 3-3-3-10-18-2T from our memory which is
nearly the fastest we can run it at, although not quite.
The Everest results reflect this with a marginally slower latency and slightly lower raw memory performance. The SiSoft results are a little different, showing an equally high raw memory performance but very low memory latency.
Want to comment? Please log in.