Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB SSD Review

Written by Harry Butler

July 7, 2010 | 09:59

Tags: #best #comparison #fastest #performance #recommended #review #sata-3 #sata-6gbps #ssd #tested

Companies: #crucial

Iometer Results

Website: Iometer

Iometer is a powerful open source synthetic benchmarking tool, able to simulate the effects of a wide variety of software loads and circumstances on either individual hard disk drives and complete drive arrays. In the past we've chosen not to include it due to bit-tech's traditional preference towards real world benchmarks. However, to correctly check for drive stutter caused by extremely high random write latencies there aren't a great deal of options, so we've finally decided to include Iometer in our hard disk testing suite.

For our Iometer testing we subject the drive to random read or write commands of 4KB, with three outstanding I/Os to simulate high level multi-tasking over a 4GB portion of the drive. We ran each test for two minutes, repeating three times to ensure we recorded an accurate result.

Iometer

4KB Random Read

  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • Crucial C300 256GB
  • G.SKill Phoenix
  • Corsair F100 100GB
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB
    • 58
    • 53
    • 49
    • 49
    • 48
    • 36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Random Read

Iometer

4KB Random Read, Average Latency

  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • Crucial C300 256GB
  • Corsair F100 100GB
  • G.SKill Phoenix
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB
  • 0.20
  • 0.21
  • 0.23
  • 0.23
  • 0.24
  • 0.32
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Milliseconds (lower is better)

Iometer

4KB Random Read, Maximum Latency

  • OCZ Vertex 120GB
  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • Crucial C300 256GB
  • G.SKill Phoenix
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB
  • Corsair F100 100GB
  • 0.5
  • 3.5
  • 3.6
  • 43.0
  • 44.0
  • 71.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Milliseconds (lower is better)

Discuss this in the forums
Corsair HS60 Haptic Headset Review

October 15 2020 | 14:00

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU