Memory Performance:
-
XFX nForce 680i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
-
Foxconn N68S7AA
-
Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus
-
EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI
-
Asus Commando
-
5209
-
5055
-
5087
-
5369
-
5141
-
5678
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
MB/s
-
XFX nForce 680i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
-
Foxconn N68S7AA
-
Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus
-
EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI
-
Asus Commando
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
nanoseconds (lower is better)
As far as nForce 680i SLI's go, the XFX performs a bit better, with a lower latency as well, even when running our "normal" 3-3-3-9-18-1T memory timings.
-
XFX nForce 680i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
-
Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus
-
EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI
-
Asus Commando
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MB/s
-
XFX nForce 680i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
-
Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus
-
EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI
-
Asus Commando
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
MB/s
-
XFX nForce 680i SLI
-
Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
-
Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus
-
EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI
-
Asus Commando
nanoseconds (lower is better)
Everest tells a slightly different tale, with the Inno3D beating the XFX on all accounts, although not by much. The XFX seems to almost equal the cheaper EVGA nForce 680i LT SLI board instead.
Want to comment? Please log in.