First Look: AMD's Phenom processors

December 13, 2007 | 09:00

Tags: #26 #22 #23 #24 #9500 #9600 #9700 #agena #analysis #benchmarks #cpu #encoding #ghz #mp3 #pcmark #performance #phenom #review #testing

Companies: #amd #divx

Blender

Website: Blender.org

Blender is a free, open source software 32-bit 3D modelling, animation, rendering, post-production, and gaming program. Initially developed by Ton Roosendaal's company NaN in the Netherlands, its popularity, and capabilities, have grown over the years. There is a large and active user base with ongoing development by dedicated hackers, making Blender a powerful and viable 3D software solution.

It can be used for modelling, UV unwrapping, texturing, rigging, skinning, animating, rendering, particle and other simulating, non-linear editing, compositing, and creating interactive 3D applications.

Blender has a robust feature set similar in scope and depth to other high-end 3D software such as Softimage|XSI, Cinema 4D, 3ds Max and Maya. These features include advanced simulation tools such as rigid body, fluid, and soft body dynamics, modifier based modelling tools, powerful character animation tools, a node based material and compositing system and Python for embedded scripting.

Blender

Internal_SMP

  • Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • 42.80
  • 45.23
  • 45.56
  • 50.36
  • 50.86
  • 55.99
  • 56.68
  • 60.18
  • 61.29
  • 64.61
  • 67.13
  • 69.90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Blender

Internal

  • Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • 85.11
  • 89.46
  • 89.92
  • 100.20
  • 100.33
  • 111.21
  • 111.21
  • 119.89
  • 124.58
  • 133.63
  • 138.19
  • 143.69
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

The Blender scores tank, quite frankly. The older Athlon 64 X2s work faster, especially in the single-core test, as they have the clock speed advantage. However, even the 2.4GHz Intel Q6600 is nearly 17 percent faster than a 2.4GHz Phenom 9700. In the SMP test, Phenom performance is slightly better, but not by much.

Maxon Cinebench 10 x64

Website: Cinebench

Maxon Cinebench is based on Maxon's popular animation software, Cinema 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. We've used the built-in CPU benchmark, which uses a 3D scene file to render a photo-realistic image of a concept bike. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders.

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - xCPU, 800x600 Image

  • Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • 13309
  • 12150
  • 10855
  • 10513
  • 9932
  • 9669
  • 9247
  • 9061
  • 6648
  • 5929
  • 5877
  • 5344
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
15000
Score

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - 1CPU, 800x600 Image

  • Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • 3743
  • 3526
  • 3506
  • 3118
  • 3095
  • 3037
  • 2825
  • 2802
  • 2718
  • 2475
  • 2450
  • 2317
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Score

Again, single-core performance is pitiful as the low clocked Phenoms can barely keep pace with the rest of the field. However, multi-core performance is far better and the overall performance is within a whisker of a similarly clocked Intel alternative.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04