Direct SLI & CrossFire performance comparative
We compared a standard MSI motherboard which features both SLI and CrossFire, the P55-GD65, to the MSI Big Bang-FUZION that includes the Lucid Hydra 200 chip. This allows us to see how much performance difference there is from driver overhead or system optimisation using two identical cards, and if the Hydra chip gives any immediate (dis-)advantage.
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB SLI
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB Hydra
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB CF
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB Hydra
FPS (arranged by min FPS)
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB CF
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB SLI
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB Hydra
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB Hydra
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
FPS (arranged by min FPS)
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB CF
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB SLI
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB Hydra
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB Hydra
FPS (arranged by min FPS)
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB SLI
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB CF
-
2x GeForce GTX 260 896MB Hydra
-
2x Radeon HD 5770 1GB Hydra
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
FPS (arranged by min FPS)
As Batman is hard-limited to 60fps, we look at the minimum frame rate to see the smoothness of gameplay. Clearly we expected the Nvidia cards to turn out better in this Nvidia TWIMTBP game, and for all intent and purposes actual SLI and Hydra are within a hairs breadth of each other. Unfortunately the same can't be said for the Radeon cards which, when installed in the Hydra, stutter occasionally, dropping the minimum, although the average is still solidly 60fps.
In the other games things aren't so rosy though, with the Hydra configurations falling really very far behind the actual SLI setups. Call of Duty 4 suffered microstuttering that completely hindered any smooth gameplay - this was regardless of whether ATI or Nvidia cards were used and has been consistent since we first started using Hydra with earlier drivers.
Want to comment? Please log in.